Neel’s ‘Indianness’ and the cricket connection

March 16th, 2010

We will be in India for a couple of weeks later this month. Since our visit coincides with the IPL 3, I told Neel that we will try and take him to watch a game at a ‘real stadium’. Looks like that game will be the Mumbai Indians v/s King’s XI Punjab game on the 30th of March at the Brabourne stadium.

Ever since, Neel simply can’t control his excitement— he is eagerly awaiting a glimpse of Sachin Tendulkar and his favorite player ‘Sardarji’ (Harbhajan Singh). The other day, he was out cycling and I overheard him say to a group of boys a couple of years elder to him, “When I go to Bombay, I will watch cricket in a real stadium!”. (…pity, the other kids didn’t quite share his enthusiasm; in fact, one of them was outright dismissive: “why should I care?” he asked)

Anyway, Neel is really working himself up for the game at the historic Brabourne stadium. “I will wave the India flag….. and I will also paint my face with orange, white, green and the chakra….!”  For somebody who keeps saying “Singapore is our country” and asking me everytime he sees something on India on TV “that is your country, right?”, I am glad that at least cricket is instilling the sense of Indianness that everything else we do, hadn’t. 

The IPL tickets are certainly worth it!

IPL 3 all set to kick off

March 12th, 2010

In a few hours, the curtains will go up on the third edition of IPL . Like last year, there has been some drama before the event starts, though I can’t help think that a lot of the uncertainty this year was created by folks trying to somehow get some bargaining power in the organisation of the tournament.  Otherwise, I don’t see how the below par levels of security had shown such great progress in a matter of a week. Anyway, it’s not only cricketers who seem to make quick bucks with the IPL, security consultants do too..

For the IPL’s sake, hope all goes well!

Being Indian – a book review

January 15th, 2010

To draw a pen-sketch that could represent any of the 1.2 billion people inhabiting the land of paradoxes and contradictions that is India is a Herculean challenge, with the odds against being able to successfully accomplish the task fairly high. In “Being Indian”, Pavan K Varma, a career diplomat and a writer of several books analyzing the lives of iconic characters from Indian mythology and history, attempts to do exactly the same, with a fair degree of success.

 The Indian as the world knows is a well-perpetrated myth, says Varma, “created by a quantum leap of logic, an ideological sleight of hand that derives an untenable ought from an undeniable is”. For example, the democratic temperament, spiritual outlook, tolerant nature, peaceful and non-violent character, unmaterialistic thinking and ecletic disposition– traits that are often attributed to Indians in general are mere illusions, he claims, that not only the rest of the world but also Indians  themselves (unfortunately) have come to believe in.

 With examples and excerpts drawn from diverse sources ranging from historical Indian literature to theories by contemporary sociologists, newspaper columns to social meetings, and the jokes and proverbs used in routine conversation to the legends at the back of trucks on the highways, Varma sets about deconstructing the “myths” and cast the mould of the real Indian. Despite sometimes stretching the point too far, these illustrations serve not only make the book more readable (and “less scholarly”, as Varma admits), but also help the universal reader more easily identify with the characteristic being described.

Varma poses innumerable questions related to the striking contradictions in almost all aspects of Indian society. He attempts to answer them by structuring his treatise through four sections on the impact of the phenomena of power, wealth, technology and pan-Indianness that governs the way Indians are and will be in this century. The picture that emerges is unflattering at most times as he exposes the Indian’s inherent lust and respect for power and the unabashed pursuit of wealth and materialistic pleasures with the credo that the end justifies the means. Corruption is rampant and accepted without any compunction precisely for these reasons. Democracy prevails in India not because Indians are democratic, but because “democracy has proved to be the most effective instrument for the cherished pursuit of power”. He talks about a ‘natural amorality’ where private beliefs can never come in the way of personal benefits, a slavery to positions of power that manifests in a predictable subservience of Indians in superior-subordinate relationships, and the propensity of Indians to accept the status quo and thereby breeding mediocrity.

Varma argues however that some of the apparent negativities deeply rooted in the Hindu society — he uses the terms Hindu and Indian interchangeably due to the overwhelming majority of Hindus in the country— are also symptomatic of certain characteristics that have not only allowed the nation to survive thus far but will also help Indians to make their mark globally in the coming decades. The Indian, when viewed with this angle is endowed with all the traits that could make one extremely successful: pragmatic, incorrigibly hopeful, extremely enterprising (and opportunistic), and extremely result-oriented.

 With every one in six human beings in the world expected to be an Indian sometime in this century, the book serves to give some quite an insight into the Indian psyche. But the sheer enormity and complexity of the task means that there are bound to be inconclusiveness and gaps in the hypotheses. Moreover, the book seems to discount the social impact of some of the rapid changes that are taking place in Indian society driven by an economic liberation, coupled with the fact that over half the population is below the age of 35, which could present a completely different Indian persona to the world. The book certainly stimulates interest, inquisitiveness, debate and probably even disdain at some points (the natural ‘defensive’ mechanism of an Indian), but it is rather doubtful that it has made a conclusive case for revealing “the truth about why the 21st century will be India’s”.

Being Indian: The truth about why the 21st century will be India’s

Pavan K Varma

2004, Viking

[An edited version of this review was published by the South China Morning Post]

Where are the Calypso Charmers?

January 1st, 2010

If cricket was the religion in the Caribbean, the thread that strung together the scattered islands, then the malaise of conversions is gnawing away the thread rapidly. Call it disillusionment or betrayal of faith. When I heard of it from a friend who was on a software assignment in Jamaica, I was pained. “Do you get to play cricket there?” I had asked him enviously. “Cricket?” he had said. “People here are more interested in basketball, or they’d rather become athletes, the way they run on the beach.”

Pained. Maybe even pity. Those are the feelings evoked when artistes lose their touch, when entertainers only embarrass, and charmers’ charms are rendered impotent. Less than a decade and half ago, the West Indian cricketers were the invincible, indomitable, Calypso Charmers. Feared as an opposition, but immensely lovable, they were like a tribe of warriors who fought for their pride and conquered anyone who came in their way. But it all seems like ages ago, isn’t it?

Back in 1983, as a ten-year-old boy, my father and I used to wake up at four in the morning to listen to Dicky Rutnagur and Tony Cozier (then a radio commentator). That was the series where India first gave signs of the shock-in-waiting — the Prudential World Cup victory. But it was the first test at Sabina Park in Kingston when I felt myself falling in love with the Calypso Charmers. My father, an ardent fan of the Caribbeans himself, had contributed to kindle that feeling with tales of Michael Holding, Colin Croft, Sylvester Clarke, Clive Lloyd and Alvin Kallicharan. The Windies needed some 170 odd (or was it 190 odd — the memory is a little rusty) in the post-tea session on the final day to win the test. And didn’t they do it in style? Vivian Richards and company blasted Kapil Dev and party out the attack. Since then, I’ve always looked forward to at least reading about the exploits of the Windies, no matter in which part of the world they were playing or against what opposition.

Indeed, I missed the great Caribbeans at the peak. I have never seen Holding, Roberts, Garner, Croft at their fiery best or the dominance of Lloyd and Kallicharan. But I’ve been fortunate to see the late Malcolm Marshall charging in on his slightly diagonal run-up to a field of three slips, two gullies and a forward short-leg. And an occasional blast from Sir Viv, Greenidge and Haynes. But by the mid-eighties, when my understanding of the game matured, the West Indian citadel had started cracking. Each of the above-mentioned aging pillars of that citadel gave way. All of a sudden, a side that had an enviable abundance of talent was faced with the daunting reality that talent is after all a non-replenishable quantity.

Of course, the journey downhill did see the emergence of the two great Cs — Courtney Walsh and Curtly Ambrose. For a decade and a half, these two bore the burden of holding it all together and attempt to arrest the slump. Time and again, their performances flashed back images of the team under Lloyd, turning around matches from hopeless situations. Take for instance, Walsh in Australia under Richie Richardson taking the last wicket with the Kangaroos needing 2 to win. Or Ambrose against India at Barbados or against South Africa. For all their greatness, it is saddening that the two Cs leave the game defeated, but thankfully, at least with the right to hold their head high.

Brian Lara came on to the world cricketing arena carrying the hopes and aspirations of the entire Caribbean. He may still hold the record for the highest test innings or that for the highest first class score, but he is most likely to be remembered as a case of unfulfilled promise and under-utilized potential. Handling and nourishing talent is as important as having talent, and Lara is perhaps the best instance in contemporary cricket of talent going to the head, and an obvious lack of synchronization between natural abilities and temperament. No wonder then, that after being head-to-head with Sachin Tendulkar in the race to be acclaimed the best batsman in the world, it is the latter who is now head and shoulders above the pack. For a brief while, though, Lara raised hopes of belying the question marks on his mental toughness. That was against Australia two years ago, when he almost single-handedly led the Windies to victory, playing in the process (at least, some former West Indian cricketers say so) one of the best knocks ever. Unfortunately, he never could continue in that vein, and for a side so bereft of natural talent and so shamefully dependent on Lara, that is disaster.

And now we have a team that is getting whitewashed each time it plays. 0-5 against South Africa, 0-3 against Pakistan, 0-2 against New Zealand! Are we talking of the once-mighty West Indies? It only seems to be getting worse. Look at what’s happening Down Under right now. The fragile-as-a-soap-bubble batting line-up struggles to collectively get to three-figures even against the Australian state sides. Importantly, they’ve lost a record held for almost 17 years by that great West Indian side under Lloyd and with that the striking landmark of invincibility of the Windies has been erased.

It all seems hopeless and beyond redemption. And as my friend in Jamaica said, when hope is lost and faith eroded, followers convert. That is the last straw. But as an ardent lover of West Indian cricket, I still hope for a miracle. Each time the West Indians bat, I wish that a Chanderpaul or a Hinds or a Sarwan can stand tall and play like Richards or Greenidge. Or a Nixon McLean and Mervyn Dillon will rip through an opposition line up like Holding and Roberts did. Yet, I can’t help wondering if it is hoping too much to see the Calypso Charmers again?

[This article was first published on Sulekha.com in January 2001; and subsequently also published in the Trinidadian newspaper and website, Carribean Voice].